On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 02:28:20PM +0100, David House wrote: > On 14/07/06, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Anyhow, just thought I'd mention that > >this isn't useful only for "ordinary" cyclic objects like dates. > > Correct. Which is why Chris Kuklewicz included instances for, e.g., Int :)
Ah, that's what I get for just skimming the thread! :) > I think this would be a great class to have in the standard libs. It > would be even better if we could derive it. I agree, it sounds very nice (although I've obviously not even looked at the implementation). -- David Roundy _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
