Quoth "Jared Updike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
(... quoting me)
|> Hence I would much rather have the split condition be the first
|> parameter -- the infix notation looks good, but it will need a
|> "flip" to get the parameters in the right order.
|
| This also goes along with join in python, i.e.
|
| "\n".join(xs)
| ==>
| "\n" `join` xs
| in Haskell (where join sep = concat . intersperse sep )
Suit yourself! Since we seem to be in agreement on the basic point,
I won't go into what I think about "\n".join(xs).
Donn Cave, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
