On 2013-08-22 18:19, Thiago Negri wrote: > I think Scala has this optional laziness too.
Indeed, but it's _not_ apparent in types (which can be an issue). Due to the somewhat weird constructor semantics of the JVM it also means you can have immutable values which start out(!) as null and end up being non-null. Regards, _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
