Thank you! So, if I'm writing a compiler of custom language, which I want to generate Haskell AST and further compile it with GHC, you prefer something like haskell-src-exts over pure GHC API?
2013/7/19 Antoine Latter <aslat...@gmail.com> > The package haskell-src-exts is a lot less intimidating if all you are > trying to do is programmatically generate Haskell source: > > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/haskell-src-exts > > The base types are here: > > http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/haskell-src-exts/1.13.5/doc/html/Language-Haskell-Exts-Syntax.html#t:Module > > This module has some helper function for generating parts of the AST: > > http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/haskell-src-exts/1.13.5/doc/html/Language-Haskell-Exts-Build.html > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:11 PM, John Blackbox > <blackbox.dev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > I dont know GHC API very well, but I want to generate AST of a program > using > > GHC API. > > Is there any standard method to generate Haskell code out of it? > (something > > like "print_this_for_me_please" function? :D > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
