Hi Tom, thank you for the explanation.
> I believe you are suggesting that there is redundancy in the > implementation details of these libraries, not in the APIs they > expose. I meant to say that there is redundancy in *both*. The libraries mentioned in this thread re-implement the same type internally and expose APIs to the user that are largely identical. Take care, Peter _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
