Thanks for a prompt reply, Roman.
On 05/28/2013 04:52 PM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> Any syb-style library works with GADTs, by the virtue of dealing with
> value representations instead of type representations.
I tried to use syb, but the following code fails to typecheck for me.
What am I doing wrong?
> {-# LANGUAGE GADTs, EmptyDataDecls, MultiParamTypeClasses,
TypeFamilies #-}
> {-# LANGUAGE DeriveDataTypeable, StandaloneDeriving #-}
> data HasHoles
> data Complete
> deriving instance Typeable HasHoles
> deriving instance Data HasHoles
> deriving instance Typeable Complete
> deriving instance Data Complete
> type family Holes a b :: *
> canHaveHolesT :: a -> b -> Holes a b
> canHaveHolesT _ _ = undefined
> type instance Holes HasHoles Complete = HasHoles
> type instance Holes Complete HasHoles = HasHoles
> type instance Holes HasHoles HasHoles = HasHoles
> type instance Holes Complete Complete = HasHoles
> data Expression k a where
> EQuote :: a -> String -> Expression HasHoles a
> IntLit :: a -> Int -> Expression Complete a
> EArith :: a -> ArithOp -> Expression k1 a -> Expression k2 a ->
> Expression (Holes k1 k2) a
> deriving instance Typeable2 (Expression)
> deriving instance Data (Expression k a)
> data ArithOp = OpAdd
> | OpSub
> | OpMul
> | OpDiv
> deriving (Data, Typeable)
Fails with:
> Couldn't match type `Complete' with `HasHoles'
> Expected type: a -> String -> Expression k a
> Actual type: a -> String -> Expression HasHoles a
> In the first argument of `z', namely `EQuote'
> In the first argument of `k', namely `z EQuote'
> When typechecking the code for `Data.Data.gunfold'
> in a standalone derived instance for `Data (Expression k a)':
> To see the code I am typechecking, use -ddump-deriv
> Not sure what you mean here — attoparsec does support unlimited
> lookahead, in the sense that a parser may fail arbitrarily late in the
> input stream, and backtrack to any previous state. Although attoparsec
> is a poor choice for programming language parsing, primarily because
> of the error messages.
I guess I have an outdated notion of attoparsec. But yes, error messages
seem to be the weak point of attoparsec. Also, the fact that it only
accepts bytestrings makes it harder (but no impossible, since we can
convert Strings to ByteStrings) to reuse the parser as a QuasiQuoter.
So, I'll rephrase my question. What's the best choice for a library for
parsing programming languages nowadays?
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
