Ross Paterson wrote:
On the haskell list it has almost been decided that (ST RealWorld a) and (IO a)
_should_ merge and become the same thing.
Keean.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 02:16:52PM +0000, Keean Schupke wrote:
Surely if IO is (ST RealWorld a) then (StateT RealWorld m a) is more or less the right thing?
But IO is not ST RealWorld (even if GHC pretends it is): other users of the world are not waiting for the new world produced by your Haskell program.
IO is more accurately modelled by a resumption monad, cf
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2003-August/004892.html
That suggests a possible monad transformer:
data IOT m a = Return a | Invoke (m (SysCall (IOT m a)))
but with no way to define runIOT :: Monad m => IOT m a -> IO (...),
it's not much use.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
