G'day all. Quoting Paul Hudak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry to nit-pick, but state monads are NOT syntactic sugar -- they're > just an example of good old data/functional abstraction, that also > happens to be in the form of a monad. Right. State monads help to future-proof your code because you don't have to change very much when you find that you need state _and_ something else (e.g. I/O). Cheers, Andrew Bromage _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
