Andrew Butterfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>I though clean was always strict, and that was the major difference
>>between clean and haskell (that and the fact clean is a proprietry
>>language)
>
> No - Clean is pure and lazy like Haskell,
But it uses explicit strictness annotations a lot, and provides strict
and/or unboxed versions of various fundamental types (e.g. tuples),
with some implicit coercions.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
