--- John Goerzen wrote:
tick :: Int -> State Int Int
tick newval = do put newval
return newval
Or this:
tick :: State Int Int
tick = do n <- get
return n
That is even more incomprehensible to me -- why would removing a line
before the return cause a type error?
--- end of quote ---
I can run both of those without a problem - could you post more of your code? It's
probably somewhere else. /gXm
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
