You're right with this (and the rest too). In did not pretend to play an expert. I just shared my impression.
Anyway, I think there are many reasons to learn functional programming first, and then haskell as an implementation. Max. On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 12:47:34AM -0800, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: > c) I have a very high opinion of Caml and Scheme, and their > impls, but I think you are being a bit unfair on Haskell here. > Caml has only one impl, and Scheme has many > incompatible variants (eg PLT Scheme), so in practice you > have to stick to one impl unless you use a the R3RS subset. > I don't think any of them are more stable than any particular > one of the Haskell impls. > Simon > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
