Wed, 28 Feb 2001 02:05:27 -0800, Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> If someone cares enough to do the design work, and actively wants
> the result, I'll see how hard it is to implement.
IMHO it should not be done only because it's possible. If a part
of Prelude is to be replaceable, there should be a chance that it's
useful for something.
You can't replace the whole Prelude anyway, e.g. (->) and Integer
don't look as if it was possible for them.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/
^^ SYGNATURA ZASTÊPCZA
QRCZAK
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Dylan Thurston
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans William Lee Irwin III
- RE: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Ketil Malde
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Fergus Henderson
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Fergus Henderson
- RE: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Dylan Thurston
