Fri, 09 Feb 2001 10:52:39 +0000, Jerzy Karczmarczuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> Again, a violation of the orthogonality principle. Needing division
> just to define signum. And of course a completely different approach
> do define the signum of integers. Or of polynomials...
So what? That's why it's a class method and not a plain function with
a single definition.
Multiplication of matrices is implemented differently than
multiplication of integers. Why don't you call it a violation of the
orthogonality principle (whatever it is)?
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/
^^ SYGNATURA ZASTÊPCZA
QRCZAK
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
- In hoc signo vinces (Was: Revamping the numeric ... Jerzy Karczmarczuk
- Re: In hoc signo vinces (Was: Revamping the... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: In hoc signo vinces (Was: Revamping the... William Lee Irwin III
- Re: In hoc signo vinces (Was: Revamping... Dylan Thurston
- Re: In hoc signo vinces (Was: Revamping the... Jerzy Karczmarczuk
- Re: In hoc signo vinces (Was: Revamping... William Lee Irwin III
- Re: In hoc signo vinces (Was: Revamping the... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: In hoc signo vinces (Was: Revamping the... Jerzy Karczmarczuk
- Re: In hoc signo vinces (Was: Revamping the... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: In hoc signo vinces (Was: Revamping the... Jerzy Karczmarczuk
- Clean numeric system? Dylan Thurston
- Deja vu: Re: In hoc signo vinces (Was: ... Laszlo Nemeth
