no, we can use the binary... Mark Hindess wrote: > On 13 June 2006 at 9:31, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That's been the plan :) >> >> I've had some conversations with Simone about this a while ago - I'd >> really like to see the code come here since I think he seens an end of >> life for MX4J as an indep project w/ jmx in Java SE. >> >> I'll see if I can rekindle that convo here... > > That would be great. > > Is there any reason not to commit the JIRA to use the binary in the > meantime? > > Regards, > Mark. > >> Mark Hindess wrote: >>> I created a JIRA about this issue, see: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-560 >>> >>> There is a patch attached if anyone wants to test it. >>> >>> The license is at: >>> >>> http://mx4j.sourceforge.net/docs/ch01s06.html >>> >>> Any thoughts or comments about whether this is a reasonable thing to do? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mark. >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
