Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > Tim Ellison wrote: >> Since we want to keep ARCHIVE working throughout we can create a branch >> if you think the pack200 dev will be dangerous (I think we can handle it >> in-place, but whatever). > > Why a branch? can it just be out of the mainline build? IOW, excluded > for everyone else in the build?
ARCHIVE is already in the mainline build and contains jar/zip support, we don't want to exclude that. > (Or just make Alex keep it working :) That would be my preference -- the committer that applies the patch and the continuous build can check win/linux compilation. If 'keeping it working' is too onerous, then branch. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
