of course... Tim Ellison wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: >> How much time? > > Can I have a day to answer that question accurately ;-) ? > > Regards, > Tim > >> Tim Ellison wrote: >>> I'd like to request more time to look through the contribution. >>> Apologies for the delay but it is a large amount of code. The vote came >>> round a bit quicker than the others -- which is good but unexpected. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tim >>> >>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: >>>> I have received the ACQs and the BCC for Harmony-528, so I can assert >>>> that the critical provenance paperwork is in order and in SVN. >>>> >>>> Please vote to accept or reject this codebase into the Apache Harmony >>>> class library : >>>> >>>> [ ] + 1 Accept >>>> [ ] -1 Reject (provide reason below) >>>> >>>> Lets let this run a minimum of 3 days unless a) someone states they need >>>> more time or b) we get all committer votes before then. >>>> >>>> Again, I think that getting this into SVN and letting people supply >>>> patches against SVN will be productive. Also, there's a lot of >>>> excitement around getting this in and a binary snapshot created... >>>> >>>> geir >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
