Daniel, I'm really sorry I can't provide you with a reasonable doc. Of course we had some drafts and outlines when we were planning the development, but it never took the form of a formal document.
Vasily -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Gandara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 12:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Contribution of RMI framework Vasily, I was not looking for public "general" designs of RMI, I do know them very well :) thanks anyway... I asked about specific design docs of your implementation and the architecture behind it; I'm sure you did it in order to "design" the package before coding it, but its ok if you do not have them handy. Daniel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zakharov, Vasily M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:46 AM Subject: RE: Contribution of RMI framework Daniel, Regretfully, we have no specific top level design documentation. However, the general design of the RMI package is described rather well in public sources. For example, you could check the "Java RMI: Remote Method Invocation" book by Troy Bryan Downing or Sun's jGuru RMI course at http://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/rmi/RMI.html Vasily -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Gandara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 1:17 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Contribution of RMI framework Vasily, I'm reviewing your implementation, I believe there is a lot to learn about other's solution to the same problem :) and I'm wondering if you can send me some top level design documentation about your package. Thanks, Daniel PS: if you happen to need it you can find more info about our design here http://www.itc.unc.edu.ar/javadev/rmi/architecture.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Gandara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 12:05 PM Subject: Re: Contribution of RMI framework >I completelly agree with Vasily, doing test and performance analysis > on RMI is not a trivial task; I'll coordinate with him the best way to > compare the packages. > > Daniel > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Zakharov, Vasily M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 1:17 PM > Subject: RE: Contribution of RMI framework > > > Hi, Mikhail, > > Regretfully, the method-to-method comparison would hardly be effective > with RMI, as it's a highly integrated component. > > 80% of implementation is hidden in non-public API, and some components > (e. g. RMIC) have no public API at all. So it's hard to plug just one > public method from one implementation to another without modifying > non-public code - and non-public code could have (and probably does > have) very different structure in different implementations. > > What we really can do is try to run both these implementations and > compare them for conformance to the specification, compatibility with > reference implementation, maybe stability, performance, visual code > quality etc. I'm now planning to do some of these, so we'd get some > results pretty soon. > > Vasily > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 7:53 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Contribution of RMI framework > > I think we need compare contributions method by method to assemble > the best classlib > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > 2006/4/14, Daniel Gandara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Vasily, >> good to know that there is someone out there who has also >> been working on rmi; I believe we'll have a lot to share and discuss >> about it. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Daniel >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Zakharov, Vasily M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 9:53 PM >> Subject: Contribution of RMI framework >> >> >> Hi, all, >> >> I would like to announce the next code contribution to Harmony project >> on >> behalf of Intel corporation. This contribution contains the >> implementation >> of RMI framework. >> >> The archive with this contribution can be found at: >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-337 >> >> The Remote Method Invocation (RMI) framework enables an object in one >> virtual machine to call methods of an object in another one, to create >> applications distributed on various Java virtual machines on the same >> or different hosts. >> >> For more information please see the documentation contained in the >> bundle. >> >> The code is a result of efforts of Intel Middleware Product Division >> team. >> One should be able to run this code with a 1.4+ compatible JRE/VM (was >> tested using commercial VMs). No classes require special support from >> the VM. >> All code is pure Java. The implementation is done according to Java > 1.4 >> specification of RMI. >> >> The archive contains the README file that explains the building and >> running >> process for this code. If any additional comments or clarifications > are >> needed, feel free to contact me. I will be happy to answer all > questions >> about this contribution and to participate in its further >> development/maintenance and integration into Harmony. >> >> Vasily Zakharov >> Intel Middleware Product Division >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
