Thanks - this is great.
Please not that every faxed document that both I and Jim, the ASF
Secretary, received was unreadable.
I can't know if it was the original copy, or the fax machine, but we
need to have everything resent again.
THanks
geir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As announced before we are contributing java.rmi package on behalf of ITC
(Cordoba Institute of Technology).
Below is a short description of the contribution.
Daniel Gandara
--------------------------------------------------------------
Package name java.rmi
Package Description
Clean room implementation of java.rmi following J2SE 1.5 spec
www.fitc.unc.edu.ar/javadev/rmi/index.html
Current Status
Currently our package contains implementation for:
- java.rmi
- java.rmi.dgc
- java.rmi.registry
- java.rmi.server
package java.rmi.activation and deprecated method/classes
have not been implemented. Activation have been designed but
has not been implemented yet.
Tools like rmic and rmiregistry have not been implemented.
Architectural Design
Package has been architected following a layered design, which
seem to be the most appropriate model for the RMI implementation
in accordance with the specification.
For further details check www.fitc.unc.edu.ar/javadev/rmi/architecture.html
Javadoc
Javadoc of the package can be reached here
www.fitc.unc.edu.ar/javadev/rmi/javadocRMI/index.html
Testing
Unit and integration tests (and their documentation) are
provided with the code.
Implementation Notes
The code uses J2SE 5.0 features, such as generics, so it
requires 5.0 VM and libraries (i.e.: java.util.concurrent).
It has been tested against Sun SDK, removing the original
java.rmi.* and replacing it by ours.
www.fitc.unc.edu.ar/javadev/rmi/ideas_uro.html
Known Issues
www.fitc.unc.edu.ar/javadev/rmi/knownissues.html
Specification Issues
www.fitc.unc.edu.ar/javadev/rmi/specissues.html
