sure - makes sense (I've just learned to ignore that stuff but agree it
may be confusing)

Regards,
Tim

Mark Hindess wrote:
> On 03/03/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> BTW the build was modified and now it runs clean every time.
>> I'm not sure it is very good. Moreover that clean reports problems
>> like 'Could not find ...'; these problems do not break the build but
>> make me nervous about whether the build result is valid.
> 
> These are just a result of the generic clean rule.  We could add
> explict rules to every makefile if you prefer.  Personally I prefer
> this way but I was tempted to change the rule to use:
> 
>   -del ... >nul 2>&1
> 
> to make it the equivalent of the unix:
> 
>   -rm -rf ...
> 
> I did this for a while when I was testing and it certainly makes the
> build output a little less verbose/confusing.
> 
> Regards,
>  Mark.
> 
> --
> Mark Hindess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> IBM Java Technology Centre, UK.
> 

-- 

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.

Reply via email to