[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-151?page=comments#action_12368487 ]
Tim Ellison commented on HARMONY-151: ------------------------------------- Yes, that is a reasonable approach -- I expect that the lack of specification for these values is an oversight. > RI docs does not specify values for constant fields in > javax.accessibility.AccessibleAction interface > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HARMONY-151 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-151 > Project: Harmony > Type: Bug > Components: Classlib > Reporter: karan singh malhi > > The RI docs do not specify the Constant field values for the three fields > defined in the javax.accessibility.AccessibleAction interface > However, the following code displays the values in those fields: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > public class AccessibleActionTest { > public static void main(String[] args) { > System.out.println(AccessibleAction.DECREMENT ); > System.out.println(AccessibleAction.INCREMENT ); > System.out.println(AccessibleAction.TOGGLE_EXPAND); > } > } > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > The output is : > decrement > increment > toggle expand > Should we go ahead and initialize the fields of the AccessibleAction > interface with the values obtained from the above output ? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
