Geir Sounds like no one objects to the proposal itself, the discussion is about the naming. Could you please approve/decline new componentization?
Thanks, Mikhail On 1/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Stepan Mishura wrote: > >> Sounds dirty. How about security-x? > >> > > > > Ok. I named it by analogy with x-net. Your variant works for me. > > x-net has the same issue for me. I figure that net-x is better too > because it will sit next to net in a directory/IDE package tree, etc... > (just like security-x near security) > > geir > > > > > Thanks, > > Stepan > > > > > > On 1/27/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Sounds dirty. How about security-x? > >> > >> Stepan Mishura wrote: > >>> I agree with the proposal and I'm ready to start working on a patch for > >>> splitting 'security2' into suggested components and integrating them > >> with > >>> the current build. > >>> > >>> Also I'd like to suggest a name for a new component: 'x-security'. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Stepan Mishura > >>> Intel Middleware Products Division > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 1/19/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> Hello > >>>> > >>>> Let's start a different thread for that. > >>>> > >>>> I suggest revisiting current componentization for security related > >> parts. > >>>> Now we have for example crypto architecture in security module but > >>>> crypto extension in the crypto module. > >>>> > >>>> See natural components in the UserGuide > >>>> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/ > >>>> > >>>> The proposal is to have 3 components: > >>>> 1. general security & crypto > >>>> 2. ssl > >>>> 3. jaas > >>>> > >>>> The logical content of those components would be: > >>>> 1. > >>>> - General Security > >>>> - Certification Path > >>>> - JCE > >>>> > >>>> 2. > >>>> - JSSE > >>>> > >>>> 3. > >>>> - JAAS > >>>> - JGSS > >>>> - SASL > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Physical content of those components: > >>>> > >>>> 1. > >>>> java.security > >>>> javax.crypto > >>>> javax.security.cert > >>>> 2. > >>>> javax.net > >>>> 3. > >>>> javax.security w/o javax.security.cert > >>>> org.ietf > >>>> > >>>> Opinions? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Mikhail Loenko > >>>> Intel Middleware Products Division > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Stepan Mishura > > Intel Middleware Products Division > > >
