Agreed And if we have some internal classes that users could benefit from then we may provide usage examples or even tools that utilize those classes.
I have an example. Security2 has implementation of ASN.1 that is internal stuff but has its own value. And it has a document for developers who might use that internal stuff jre-independent. Thanks, Mikhail Loenko Intel Middleware Products Division On 2/10/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Matt Benson wrote: > > --- Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > >> Anton Avtamonov wrote: > >>> Besides, such approach ties them to Harmony if > >> they found such > >>> extensions (funtionality, included into packages > >> of 'public access') > >>> useful :-) > >> We actually don't want to tie anyone into Harmony > >> other than because > >> we're free, fast, stable, etc. > >> > >> This project *may* at some point offer packages that > >> are not part of > >> J2SE (for example, if we had built a nice logging > >> implementation that > >> was resuable), but that would clearly be separate > > > > AND JRE-INDEPENDENT > > Indeed. Right. Exactly. > > geir > > > > >> parts of the project, > >> and not to be confused with Harmony the J2SE > >> Implementation. > >> > > > > -$0.02 -Matt > > > >> geir > >> > >> > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > >
