Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
<snip>
reasons Mark and others described.
I'll go review, but can you summarize?
Sure
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200601.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200601.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
That's not really a summary :) Thanks for the links. Like it or not,
Sun's javadoc is the spec. We can get involved in the EG and help fix
the javadoc of course, and we can add additional commentary about the
our interpretation and implementation to improve it, but we need to
ensure that we take reasonable steps to avoid confusion.
and a related comment that Sunny made about IDEs that grok JavaDoc
comments to help users & developers
The argument isn't about not having javadoc - we have to have javadoc,
for both java* and org.apache.harmony*.
geir
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200601.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
HTH
Tim
