On Sun, 30 May 2010, Viktor Szakáts wrote: hi,
> Thanks for the patch. We already had "LLVM/Clang C" > detection inside the __GNUC__ branch, is it still > necessary, or can we now safely delete it? the current one is for clang1 (no clang_major and friends, but defines gnuc and llvm), while the new snippet is for clang2 (which has clang_major and friends -- it still defines gnuc and the shebang, but i don't think i belongs in that branch. maybe it could be turned around a bit so that all the llvm/clang things are moved out of the gnuc block, but at the same time it fits the way mingw/rsx*/etc are handled now. i'd say leave it like this, and maybe do some shuffling several clang and/or llvm versions in the future, when things come to light. right now the question basiclaly is: can you get clang without llvm? can you get llvm without clang? i don't really know the answer to these, and that's what's needed to decide whether or not (and how) to move it out into it's own block. -- [-] mkdir /nonexistent _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
