>> There is an "dirty hack" (their words) to solve this >> problem in xhb code, and while I can do something similar >> in Harbour (although in less ugly way), I'm curious >> what is the purpose of "@RE" mask for numeric values? >> Seem like something invalid to me. > As for Clipper NG, it's seem to be a undocumented feature, > because Clipper's @E formats numbers (not only dates) in British way: > thousand and decimal separator are reversed. > > Typical formatting - 1,000,000.00 > British (and Polish) - 1.000.000,00
So what is the expect behavior for @RE? Can you show an example. I can't run Clipper or xhb. Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
