Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
> I thought we've discussed this a few times. In fact
> the solution is the same since my first msg regarding
> this topic:
>
> -3rd=hbide_extrafile=my.txt
>
> I didn't hear back from you what is the problem with
> above solution.
>
No problem in the above solution until I introduce
this to be embedded into existing implementation in
a transparent way, and believe me, it is really a
big job. I will look into this sometime in future.
I do not question your stance, but BTW, why we cannot
filer it on hbMK2 levels. I simply know that you do not want
but am not aware why.
-----
enjoy hbIDEing...
Pritpal Bedi
http://hbide.vouch.info/
--
View this message in context:
http://harbour-devel.1590103.n2.nabble.com/Question-regardin-the-good-hbide-tp5040280p5041264.html
Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
