Hi,
On 2010.05.11 12:22, rafa wrote:
Of cause. Did you expect your code to behave in a different way?...
I thought he reindex all at once ;-)
The reason is because only one index reindex a table, while the others
wait, I do not know.
The reason is hb_dbdetach(), hb_dbattach(). Workarea is attached only
after another thread have detached it. So, you should not expect any
parallelism here.
I need to save time when re-indexing on the servers, because we handle a
lot of information in the tables, over 12 GB in total.
It is interesting what is copy files time for these 12GB on your server.
This can give some idea of the result you can reach.
Regards,
Mindaugas
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
