Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
> BTW IMO getting this right is more important than any
> HBIDE work. HBIDE works enough that everyone can play
> with it, but it conveys very bad image that there are
> everyday problems in Linux f.e.
>
Yes, for sure, but still I am handicapped on account of
Linux behavior. Many are resolved and rest will be resolved.
As far as destructors behavior, I am really at a loss why
on one OS Qt behaves properly and on another does not.
If the behavior is consistent, we can fix easily, but
under current scenario it is indifferent and here lies
the crux of delay.
No Linux user has come forward to play with hbQT through hbIDE
to forward any solution, so I am just stumbling upon the
ideas which I forward and someone has to test.
May be situation improves the next days.
-----
enjoy hbIDEing...
Pritpal Bedi
http://hbide.vouch.info/
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/SF-net-SVN-harbour-project-14330-trunk-harbour-tp4895981p4896819.html
Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
