Hi, >> Yes Przemek you're right I've never tested this with Clipper 5.3 :). >> Should we make it compatible to Clipper 5.3 behavior to not process >> the VALID code block although it contradicts what was stated in the >> documentation? > > For this should answer someone who use this CL53 API. > Personally I haven't used it and I'm not familiar with > our GT code to answer if this fix can be easy applied > locally without interaction with other code. > If Viktor things that he can easy change it the probably > we should add it and mark with HB_CLP_STRICT macro.
I'm also not the user of C5.3 controls, so I can't see the big picture here, and as far as I know the code, the overall solution is not easy change. For those interested in such patch, it's worth to look into original C5.3 GETSYS.PRG, where several seemingly related code lines are commented. BTW the xhb solution looks incomplete and hackish (targeting one specific problem case instead of covering the whole issue). Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
