Hi, We have a little benchmarking section in a Clipper program we wrote that gives a percentage of how fast it's running overall. I believe it is doing 500 SIXCDX row creates etc...
For Win98 programs, are 32-bit .EXE's compiled with Harbour + TDM Mingw have around 25% on that list, whereas when they are around 200%+ when compiled as 16-bit with cl52e. This problem doesn't happen with XP and above. So, I'm wondering if for Win98, the Harbour-made .EXEs... have to emulate some 32-bit mode? Or maybe the processors in most Win98 machines are 16-bit CPUs? I really have no idea... I wish I knew more about this... but in a nutshell, our test is running WAY slower than cl52e + Win98. Thank you for reading. -- smu johnson <smujohn...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
