Works ok here using "2003-12-17" and "17-12-2003" Postgresql understand the same date , using both format
Bruno 2010/3/7 Viktor Szakáts <harbour...@syenar.hu> > > I think you need to leave the sample as it was > > > > correct for english or "traditional" postgresql style > > look this: > > > > Style Specification Description Example > > ISO ISO 8601/SQL standard 1997-12-17 07:37:16-08 > > SQL traditional style 12/17/1997 07:37:16.00 PST > > PostgreSQL original style Wed Dec 17 07:37:16 1997 PST > > German regional style 17.12.1997 07:37:16.00 PST > > > > IMO we should follow ISO standard. Can you try with "2003-12-17" ? > > (SQL traditional style is ambiguous, so it's not good for us) > > Though if any one of these depend on postgres configuration, > they are not good for us. > > (It's unbelievable that such basic problems are so poorly covered > in SQL, which is supposed to be the paramount of database handling :/ > I'd rather like to think there is a solution, only we don't know it) > > Brgds, > Viktor > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) > Harbour@harbour-project.org > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour >
_______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
