Good news. Thanks a lot.
I'm waiting for wvtqt.prg sample, as i'm using GTWVT at this time.
Best regards.
Maurizio la Cecilia                
 

> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org 
> [mailto:harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org] Per conto di Pritpal Bedi
> Inviato: domenica 28 febbraio 2010 22.15
> A: harbour@harbour-project.org
> Oggetto: Re: R: [Harbour] Re: gtwvt compatibility issue
> 
> 
> 
> Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> > 
> >> Anyway, having a GTQTC working could be a good bridge to 
> port gradually a
> >> console application to hbqt, as Pritpal could allow the 
> cohexistence of
> >> the
> >> two libs.
> >> I'm interested about the thought of Viktor and Pritpal about this.
> > 
> > IMO we should first try if it's possible to create mixed
> > GTWVT/GTXWC + HBQT applications. If this is possible,
> > there is just no need to put efforts into GTQTC.
> > 
> > Since both HBQT and GT* are using simple GUI windows,
> > I can't see why there couldn't be both of them present in
> > the same app.
> > 
> 
> GTWVT + HBQT ( alone or with hbXBP ) can coexits. No have 
> already showed it in demoqtc.prg in earlier days. Probably
> I will commint one more wvtqt.prg soon.
> 
> I donot know about GTXWC, however.
> 
> GTWIN is absolutely out of question.
> 
> GTWVT/GTWVG/(GTXWC ?) can have embedded QT GUI dialogs.
> 
> 
> -----
>                  enjoy hbIDEing...
>                     Pritpal Bedi 
> _a_student_of_software_analysis_&_design_
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://n2.nabble.com/gtwvt-compatibility-issue-tp4631971p4651003.html
> Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
> Harbour@harbour-project.org
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
> 

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to