Thanks Xavi.

I wonder though: How to solve so that we don't copy all 
complete items to achieve similar results? I prefer not 
to keep Harbour items in C structures if possible.

Brgds,
Viktor

On 2010 Feb 13, at 05:22, Xavi wrote:

> Hi Viktor,
> 
>> Should be fixed now. (Though for me only one of them
>> gave warning, pls tell if it's still wrong).
> 
> Yes you're right.
> I'm sorry, I do too many things on automatic and not is good. :)
> 
>> I see what you mean. I don't know the most optimal way
>> to solve that.         ...
> 
> Look at the patch if it can help you, only win32.
> 
>> Actually, such function could be written as .prg
>> code by anyone. Now the low-level logic is there,
>> [ ... ]
> 
> Ok. I see, it's nice.
> 
> Best regards,
> Xavi
> 
> <win_dll.patch>_______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
> Harbour@harbour-project.org
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to