Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
> Just a small note for everyone distributing HBIDE:
>
> For HBIDE it's legal to use _static libs_, so maybe
> it would be the most convenient to provide one large
> hbide.exe without QT .dll dependencies. It can also
> make the result smaller, and certainly faster.
>
> [ Sorry if this is already the case, I didn't check
> any of the binary hbide packages. ]
>
+1.
> Another note: I'm not sure it's good idea to
> supply also hbmk2. hbmk2 is part of Harbour and if
> it's moved away form original location, it won't
> work. One needs Harbour anyway to use HBIDE.
>
Surely hbMK2 must not be a part of the distro at all.
I am in the process to change a lot in hbIDE based on hbMK2.
You have hit a valid point.
-----
enjoy hbIDEing...
Pritpal Bedi
_a_student_of_software_analysis_&_design_
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Hbide-ready-to-use-tp4561432p4561600.html
Sent from the harbour-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
