> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> We could probably implement it with HB_COMPAT_C53 guard, 
>> though it will unnecessarily add overhead to this very 
>> often used function.
> 
> Both CL52 and CL53 works in such way so if we want to emulate it
> then we should guard it by HB_CLP_UNDOC macro.

Good idea.

Brgds,
Viktor

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to