Hi
You have been allways very clear on your concepts =) Thanks, but not as accurate as one should be... > But I'm a pragmatic man so I don't think we have to stick with all AS > design choices so... > I propose you to create a new class: xbpForm() or xbpGetDialog() based > on QDialog() to make upon all our get screens easier and compatible with > qtDesigner's .ui form loading. > This way you are supporting extensions to Xbase++ language. XbpHbDialog() or XbpQDialog() seems to be the right name and will base itself on QDialog() instead of QMainWindow(). It will also have a :drawigArea which will point to itself to facilitate not to rewrite the already tested code. So you are supporting Xbase class extension ? Groups opinion ? Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SF.net-SVN%3A-harbour-project%3A-13687--trunk-harbour-tp27290744p27299085.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
