>> In fact the whole point of previous implementation was >> that we warn developers if there _is_ a leak, and stay >> silent if there isn't. This way it's apparent when there >> is a problem and when not. If we wash together the >> two messages, it will be less easy to spot if there is >> a problem. I can imagine a 'zero' value could be useful >> for testers to see there _was_ testing/measurement done, >> yet the result is zero. Probably that's the reason Istvan >> added it. > > If this is the only reason then we should revert this modification. > For such functionality we have //info switch which can be used to > verify if FM statistic module is enabled and how much memory was > allocated and released. Just simply run any applications with this > switch, i.e.: > myapp.exe //info
Can you pls do it? I'm unsure what should be the "revert" state here, I did about 3-4 modifications after Istvan's initial one. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
