Hello All
I need to introduce some sort of error handelling
and have the code for one of the classes. I have verified that
this works correct. My question is : is there any better way
to handle it in a larger scale?
CREATE CLASS QCheckBox INHERIT QAbstractButton
VAR pPtr
METHOD new()
METHOD configure( xObject )
METHOD checkState()
METHOD isTristate()
METHOD setCheckState( nState )
METHOD setTristate( lY )
ERROR HANDLER onError()
ENDCLASS
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
METHOD QCheckBox:new( ... )
LOCAL p
FOR EACH p IN { ... }
p := hbqt_ptr( p )
hb_pvalue( p:__enumIndex(), p )
NEXT
::pPtr := Qt_QCheckBox( ... )
RETURN Self
METHOD QCheckBox:onError()
LOCAL cMsg := __GetMessage()
IF SubStr( cMsg, 1, 1 ) == "_"
cMsg := SubStr( cMsg, 2 )
ENDIF
// TODO: generate runtime error
hbqt_messageBox( cMsg, "Message not found - " + ProcName( 1 ) + ":" +
hb_ntos( ProcLine( 1 ) ) )
RETURN cMsg
At least the code above let the developer know
if he has made any mistakes in message passing than to see
application just vanishing.
Regards
Pritpal Bedi
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/HBQT---Class-Error-Handelling-tp26882195p26882195.html
Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
