On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, Viktor Szakáts wrote:

 > > considering that currently all g++ <v4 builds are broken, the 
 > > answer should be a "yes", though :) (gcc 2.95 is omnipresent on 
 > > less-than-mainstream-but-still-important platforms, so compatibility 
 > > with that should be a quite high priority.)
 > 
 > Probably yes, especially since lot of ppl still use 3.4.x 
 > even on Windows, although it's only a real problem if someone 
 > is using 3.4.x with QT 4.5.x, even then it's currently not 
 > fatal as HBQT uses an empty init/exit routine ATM.
 > 
 > I don't know though how grave the problem is, so, if it's 
 > not an easy fix, I think can live with that issue until next 

it's an easy one (switch g++ to static startup), in fact przemek has 
just included this in his list 3 minutes before i sent my mail, so i 
consider this taken are of


-- 
[-]

mkdir /nonexistent
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to