On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, Viktor Szakáts wrote: > > considering that currently all g++ <v4 builds are broken, the > > answer should be a "yes", though :) (gcc 2.95 is omnipresent on > > less-than-mainstream-but-still-important platforms, so compatibility > > with that should be a quite high priority.) > > Probably yes, especially since lot of ppl still use 3.4.x > even on Windows, although it's only a real problem if someone > is using 3.4.x with QT 4.5.x, even then it's currently not > fatal as HBQT uses an empty init/exit routine ATM. > > I don't know though how grave the problem is, so, if it's > not an easy fix, I think can live with that issue until next
it's an easy one (switch g++ to static startup), in fact przemek has just included this in his list 3 minutes before i sent my mail, so i consider this taken are of -- [-] mkdir /nonexistent _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour