Hi,
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
I don't mind if a PHB_ITEM container is used if it makes
sense, or makes coding simpler or documented.
But it doesn't.
I want to see the second version (without extra item) working by default in the
final code, but I want to leave HB_USE_ITEM define, to make users have a sample
of various ways to cross-reference GC blocks. They can see both of versions,
compare it and understand how things work.
I'd like to leave only one option and it's a strong opinion.
I see no point at all to give user options for such a small and
low-level details
...
Such information is useful only for expert users and should
be added to /doc, instead of final code.
I'm not good at writing docs, so, let's remove it from SVN code after
you (or someone else) will add it to the docs :)
Regards,
Mindaugas
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
