On Sat, 28 Nov 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi,
> >> documented RTE which can substitute result so it can be easy > >> caught by user and if necessary he can set his own preferable > >> value for such unknown OLE variant. > >> What it group opinion here? > > +1 to Nil (if I have a voice) > I also prefer NIL (or some other distinctive error > value) than RTE. This is current behavior. Anyhow now we are supporting nearly all VARIANT types so such RTE can appear rather seldom and can greatly help to locate possible problems. Please note that it's possible that we moved RDDADO code from contrib to example due to problems in HBWIN OLE code unnoticed because such RTE was not generated. BTW I'm still waiting for verification of reported RDDADO problems with current HBWIN OLE code. Can some MS-Windows users check it? best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour