Hello
Tecnologia-2 wrote: > > Hello Harbour-project! > > First, I must tell that IMO xhb-diff.txt document is the best effort ever > made to state parameters that really help [x]Harbour users to choose > between Harbour and xHarbour. Beyond all the facts it describes, the > reading gives a clue about the different development philosophy and > orientation behind the languages. Thank you Przemeck and friends and > congratulations! > > I agree to Teo that xhb-diff should be accessible from the Harbour-project > web page and it's also a very good thing that xhb-diff be part of Harbour > packages. > +1 > Although xhb-diff.txt is deep (and maybe because of it), I would like to > suggest that it should be the base to another text, shorter and easier, to > stand at the Harbour-project web pages to highlight everything that > Harbour does very well or (when it is inevitable to compare) better than > xHarbour. This text could help clarify that where is written "xHarbour > will offer an alternative for those interested in a more aggressive & less > conservative approach" in xHarbour.org web page, one should read "Harbour > developers think better before writing the code down". > ++1 > [x]Harbour current and potencial users need to know, for a start, that the > ST or MT mode in Harbour is not a "shakesperian" [existencial] question as > in xHarbour, but is resumed to "to link or not to link" one single VM > library! This single information tells more about the strength of the > Harbour VM conception than all propaganda could tell! If the performance > test results could be published as well I think it would be good to all > [x]Harbour community. By the way, who doesn't care about sheaper, better > and faster in this business!? > MT in Harbour is simply fantastic, even better than Xbase++, I endorse this fact. strongly. > One question: > I couldn't understand what was resolved about Harbour documentation. The > discussion on the mailling list seems not finished and without resolution. > What was decided and how is it? > The unresolved part was "volunteer efforts" which nobody seemed to extend except April White. Probbaly someone have to take the initiative and charge passionately. Regards Pritpal Bedi -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Fwd%3A--Viktor--Suggestions-on-How-to-Get-Help-tp26217598p26222794.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
