Do you remember that HB_[U]LONG is not the same as [U]LONG?
I had it in mind, but after quick (sloppy) check
it seemed the same.
If they are not: what to do? It depends on the
precise meaning of HB_[U]LONG, which I'm not sure of.
Am I off the track too much if I say that current
HB_[U]LONG should really be called HB_VM[U]INT ?
IOW this is the 'parnint'/'retnint'/'itemPutNInt'
value. Or is this something different?
If this is so, first we should do this conversion
to make room for new meaning of HB_[U]LONG. Question
is how much 3rd parties will be affected.
Alternatively we should either drop "regular"
[U]LONG as core type, or find it another name,
(which won't be very easy).
Brgds,
Viktor
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
