Very Thanks for clarification to hbmk
I have a different experiences, that allow ne see only one side of problem
now try explain my point of view
A percentage of Harbour user in first steep are not able to compile
sample, particular contrib because not know parameter of hbmk
I invite also Other Guru like roberto lopez,rathinagiri reply here if
think that problem exist or share his experiences
2009/10/27 Viktor Szakáts <harbour...@syenar.hu>:
>>> hbmk2 test.prg hbmemio.hbc
>>> why cannot you copy '-lhbmemio' ('hbmemio.hbc') to your compile/link
>>> command?
>>> I do not see any functional difference. In both cases you have to copy
>>> sth from reference code but in the second case you are using unknown
>>> for Clipper users syntax which does not have clear for all behavior.
>>
>> No the problem is that is not possible hbmk2 info is allways migging
>> many user require here "How compile sample from qt or other" because
>> thie information is not jouned to prg
>
> Since such #pragma can be left out as well (not obligatory),
> in this respect it's not much better than adding a simple
> comment to source.
>
>>>> xbase++ for same final result use
>>>> #pragma library("xppui3.lib")
>>>> as you read in ainet sample
>>>>
>>>> http://news.alaska-software.com/readmessage?id=%3c1xwdedeqtb373$.1kbal6arq2jed....@40tude.net%3e&group=public.soapbox
>>>
>>> This is completely different feature because it works at link time so can
>>> be used in binary libraries.
>>> Unfortunately due to portability such feature cannot be added to Harbour
>>> because it may work only with some subset of supported by Harbour C
>>> compilers and practice shows that such non portable features create
>>> much more troubles then resolve problems.
>>> The proposed:
>>> #pragma option:hbmk2 ...
>>> is compile time feature and it does not work with binary libraries.
>>> Looks that using above example you only confirmed that this #pragma
>>> command can confuse users who may just like you expect different
>>> behavior then the real one ;-)
>>> So my current conclusion is that it will only create new problems
>>> instead of help newbie users.
>>
>> afaik i can add lib in hbc
>> i am afraid i dont undestand you about what is binary library
>> to lack in my knowdlege
>> Here i hope that viktor explain
>> Why in compile time feature can't add binary library?
>> I don't want absolutely create new problems
>
> Pulling .hbc files (or .lib files) cannot be done from
> binary files (as object and libs) since it relies on source
> code parsing and hbmk2 logic, instead of being a linker
> feature. We can't change that unless we drop some compilers
> from the mix, but even then nothing guarantees that it can
> be kept in the future for new compilers.
>
> To put it short:
>
> Everyone posting examples requiring external libs or needing
> special options should include the hbmk2 command line in their
> posted examples. Easy, simple, straighforward and it works _now_.
>
> Brgds,
> Viktor
>
> _______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list
> Harbour@harbour-project.org
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>
--
Massimo Belgrano
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
