Ops... Sorry I misplace this email. :(
Wonderful world of Clipper's patches and versions.
At the moment I see only one version.
--
Xavi
Maurizio Faccio adinet escribió:
Yes I have but I take care that pick the correct one.
I've just can patch to CLIPPER 5.2e library. Just run "patch 52elib"
under de .\LIB directory.
I've binary compare the file NTXSPA.obj patched and unpatched are the
same, despite they change of time stamps.
Viewing with a hex viewer I found in the .OBJ -> NTXSORT v1.21e x15
24/Jun/93·· - SPANISH DBFNTX Collation
I also view with the hex viewer the patched CLIPPER.LIB -> NTXSORT
v1.21e x15 24/Jun/93·· - SPANISH DBFNTX Collation
I send you the new cpinfo.txt
1- Clipper patched without clipper.lib patch
2- Harbour es850c
3- Clipper patched with clipper.lib patch
Thanks
Maurizio
Viktor Szakáts escribió:
or, it's possible you have multiple copies of Clipper .libs,
and the non-patched one gets picked by the linker.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2009 Oct 9, at 12:14, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
What I do not understand is that:
Compiler says that the patch was applied correctly
Clipper (R) 5.2e
Copyright (c) 1985-1995, Computer Associates International, Inc.
But VERSION() in clipper tolds -> 5.2d Intl. (x215) (1994.03.25)
It seems the .lib files (or at least some of them) didn't get updated,
but the compiler did.
Brgds,
Viktor
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
