Talks about LetoDb inclusion in the harbour tree were really productive. Przemek gave as such a valuable technical introspection to the current state of LetoDB.
I will be the honest, his explanations lead me to the choice to cease our migration to LetoDb RDD engine. During this discussions, Przemek explained that he has no needs for client server RDD: ".. In my case whole applications are executed on server side " ? Please, can you explain us what is the architecture of your applications ? Especially how do you implement client side ? Regards, Ernad ----- "Przemyslaw Czerpak" <dru...@acn.waw.pl> wrote: > On Mon, 05 Oct 2009, Alexandr Okhotnikov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Rather for people who do not want to move his code to server > side. > > > ADS is only partial solution and much better and more efficient > is > > > moving whole application to the server and execute it remotely. > > 50-100 councurrent access > > Over 100 in one of my installations. > > > 1. very large load on the server > > No at least in programs I wrote. The most expensive is database > access > and rest is unimportant. > > > 2. Given the current local machine (very productive) - why do we > need > > a decision like Terminal-server? > > Sorry I do not use terminal server so I do not know what answer do > you > expect from me. > > 3. not everything can be transferred to the server (browse...) > > I still do not understand. > In my case whole applications are executed on server side. > _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
