On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Viktor Szakáts <harbour...@syenar.hu> wrote: >> In this particular case I suggest to pase -undef:.ARCH. to >> xHarbour compiler and maybe in the future one of xHarbour >> developers (maybe Phil) will add support for this switch >> so it will not be ignored.
Of course I can do it and will do it when I have time, I only would like to see that it has established in Harbour. Basically, I don't like the syntax, why was .ARCH. chosen, what do these dots mean, are they somehow related to xBase syntax for logical values and operators? ;) Are there any other samples of usage of such syntax? Does someone else feel it like me? > Let's hope so. The other annoying bit is __PLATFORM__Windows > and __PLATFORM__Linux. Hopefully someone will fix them there. I think we ([x]Harbour) should define both versions in the current situation. It was of course a bad choice to make them mixed-case initially, but I think that it should be kept for compatibility. -- Ph. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
