You are right.
[ IOW recompiling a single file or module doesn't bump Harbour
to the new version number by definition. ]
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2009.09.09., at 19:36, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
To make that, I think we should finally make the step to
rename ChangeLog to CHANGES to make 8.3 systems happy. If
this is done we can add a make rule to update hbverbld.h
when CHANGES changed. [ as a side effect some ugly kludges
could be deleted which aim to handle this case. ] [ If
this is done, source/hbpp/Makefile should be touched which
is best done by Przemek. ]
Maybe there are better ideas for it though.
Personally I prefer current behavior.
Too much times in the past I had to look for false bug
reports due to old or not fully recompiled Harbour code
so I do not like the idea that we begin to update revision
number after each ChangeLog modification. We simply lost
the simplest method to verify user harbour binaries.
I know that it's not perfect but for me it's much better
then nothing.
best regards,
Przemek
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
