Pritpal Bedi wrote:
Is the XBase++ approach accepted by the Harbour group as the defacto
standard?
You are replied to this question in previous message from Viktor.
I did not see it.
You need to update yourself on Xbase++.
I am not as sure as you.
When we talk about Clipper we know we are talking about console, not GUI.
When we talk about GUI, we talk about FWH, HWGUI, HMG, XAILER, VXH and few
more
here and there, but we do not talk about Harbour. Do we ?
I do not understand your point. Apparently you believe when we talk GUI we mean
XBase.
We selected Xbase++ standards for these reasons:
I think you did, and no-one argued. This is ok.
Yes, and this suggests that we must deploy our resources in right
directions.
I urge the users to be vocal on the list. It creates a sense of satisfaction
and
acceptance.
NOTE: Xbase++ framework based on Qt has received a very little response
till date mainly due to the fact that users are diversified to so
many GUI's.
Probably, it will take little more time if someone may jump in
seriously.
Nevertheless, my efforts will remain 100%concentrated on the
subject.
I am grateful for your efforts and I am not trying to denigrate them. However,
"contradict" is a strong word and I do not think the situation is nearly as
clearcut as you think, your last comments above appear to support my point. I,
personally, would like to see most of contrib, including qt, moved to a separate
project. I am also content to be a minority of 1 and will cease to make waves
about it.
Regards
Alex
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
