I didn't remove it, and don't intend to do so until we
have the new high-level which is being used here too.
I also some differences between the two branches, but didn't
investigate.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2009.07.30., at 0:37, Francesco Saverio Giudice wrote:
Hi Viktor,
Il 30/07/2009 12.01, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net ha scritto:
* examples/httpsrv/uhttpd.prg
* examples/httpsrv/uhttpd.hbp
* examples/httpsrv/readme.txt
% Given less focus on the socket selection issue. Now the only
difference is .prg level API and local API is fully portable.
* Made the proprietary one the default on all platforms.
(it looks much more obvious/simple to use, also requires less
STATIC variables)
please don't remove INET version, because I have no time in this
moment to check httpsrv, but some fast tests I have seen that there
are problems with both version (inet and custom) and I want to
investigate.
Previously of last Przemek's hb_socket and of last additions and
directory move, inet version works well (apart from inet internal
errors discussed in last days that could occurs).
Now I would check:
- to fix errors in hrb modules (actually not working, checked fastly
path but there is something else)
- sometimes pages are not displayed (try to force page refresh with
F5)
- verify, as per Przemek request, hb_inet() compatibility with
previous version
Best Regards,
Francesco
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
